DPLS 703--Policy Analysis--3 credits
Summer 2002
{session title}
Professor: James Beebe
Office: RC 246
Office Phone: (509) 323-3484
Home phone: 456-2571 |
Room RC 240
Thursday 6:00-10:00pm
plus Friday July 25 |
| Office hours: Call for appointment |
email: beebe@gonzaga.edu |
|
Course
Information
BLACKBOARD LINK
Blackboard
Information
and Login
Instructions
Bibliography
and On-line Resources
|
Sessions
and Assignments
Advanced
Assignment by 5:00 June 27
Session
1A: June 27, 5:00-5:45 ACT Lab Foley
Session
1: June 27, 6:00-10:00
Session
2: July 4, 6:00-10:00
Session
3: July 11, 6:00-10:00
Session
4: July 18, 6:00-10:00
Session
5: July 25, 6:00-10:00
Session
6A: July 26, Friday, 4:30-5:45 ACT Lab Foley
Session
6: July 26, Friday, 6:00-10:00
Session
7: Aug 1, 6:00-10:00
|
THIS COURSE IS TAUGHT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FAIR PROCESS
MANUAL
Gender
Equity in Higher Education Resource Page
COURSE DESCRIPTION
Emphasis on both policy analysis and policy development. Based
on the development of empirical data, the student utilizes both a deductive
and an inductive decision-making process for problem analysis.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
Leaders deal with policy in a variety of ways, including but not
limited to policy analysis. This course is designed to provide an introduction
to conceptual tools for policy analysis, with special focus on asking the right
questions of whomever might be doing the actual policy analysis. The course
also explores the relationships between responding to policy made by others
and trying to influence the policy making process, evaluating efforts at policy
change, and factoring ethical issues into the policy process.
In order to make the discussions of the policy process more meaningful,
the course will consider policy issues concerning gender equity. This is not
a course about gender equity, but it is hoped that having a real policy issue
to consider for the term will make it possible to integrate a variety of activities
and issues. Gender equity is both a macro and a micro issue, and has relevance
for almost any situation we are likely to find ourselves in.
One of the early lessons I learned was that often it is not enough
to be "right." There is a need to carefully consider the criteria for determining
what is right and an even greater need to build support and coalitions for bringing
about desired changes. A focus in this course on building coalitions does imply
that in some situations there is not a need for a single strong voice. The need
to implement policy, as opposed to just deciding on policy direction, necessitates
compromises, and issues of ethics become both critical and confusing.
By the end of the course students will be able to:
- use traditional, modern, and soft systems methods for examining policy
issues and identify ways in which different approaches produce different
results;
- identify strategies for dealing with policy changes imposed from outside
the local organization, with special attention to the role of the leader
in making externally imposed policy work;
- identify strategies for influencing externally imposed policy and demonstrate
selected traditional and computer based skills for influencing external
policy;
- identify potential ethical and social justice issues inherent in policy
work and present ideas for addressing these issues; and
- develop a strategy for dealing with a policy issue that identifies the
specific steps that need to be implemented, defines what is needed in the
way of policy analysis, and identifies the specific responsibilities of
the leader in carrying out the strategy.
LEARNING ACTIVITIES
While achievement of the objectives identified above is primarily the responsibility
of the student, several different learning activities have been designed to
facilitate this process. Reading, being forced to think about the reading by
having to write about what has been read, and then applying the content of the
reading to real world issues should help students master content. Written assignments
are designed to provide opportunities to experiment with the application of
concepts. Sharing written assignments with classmates before class and class
interaction in both small and large groups should help students learn from the
experiences of each other.
Students who have laptop computers
may want to bring them for group activities.
WEB BASED SYLLABUS
It will make it easier to return to the course syllabus and the Discussion Board
for the class if you add these to your "bookmarks" or "favorites." Expect
this syllabus to change over the course of the term. Changes will be listed
in the Announcements on Blackboard. The date at the bottom of the page
indicates the date on which the syllabus was last changed. Depending on
the Internet browser you use and how you have configured it (or in most cases
the default setting), when you return to the syllabus, you may not see changes
that have been made. Your computer saves a copy of the page and when you
return to it, it brings up what was saved. To ensure that you are getting the
most recent copy off the server you need to click on "reload."
ASSESSMENT AND GRADING
Everyone who completes all the assignments and actively participates can expect
an A. Students who do not complete all the assignments can expect an Incomplete
until the assignments are done. Problems getting the books and problems
with technology are understood. Assignments, however, should still be
done as soon as possible even if delayed. Timely completion of written assignments
is critical, both for the individual and the other members of the class. Late
submission of two or more written assignments (excluding the advanced assignment)
that involve other students (assignments that are supposed to be posted to the
Discussion Board can reduce your grade by a half letter (for example A to A-).
It is important to keep up. Written assignments involving a review of
other work will not be "graded" or commented upon by the instructor. They
are designed to facilitate mastery of the material covered in the course. Assignments
where you can expect written comments from the instructor are noted.
REQUIRED TEXTS
Birkland, Thomas (2001), An introduction to the policy process: Theories,
concepts, and models of public policy making. Armonk NY: M.W. Sharpe
Majchrzak, Ann (1984). Methods for policy research. Newbury Park CA: Sage
Publications.
Stone, Deborah A. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political
decision making. Revised Edition. New York: Norton.
Fisher, R., Ury, W. and Patton, B (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating
agreement without giving in. Second Edition. New York: Penguin Books.
For more information contact
docinfo@gonzaga.edu
or write to
Doctoral Program in Leadership
Gonzaga University
Spokane, WA USA 99258
(509) 323-3490
|
 |
 |
 |
Copyright 2002
Page maintained by
beebe@gonzaga.edu
revised 04/23/2002
|
[ Schoolof
Professional Studies][ DoctoralProgram
in Leadership Studies][ GonzagaUniversity]
[Policy Analysis
DPLS 703 Summer 2002 home page]