| Professor: James Beebe
Office: RC 256 Office Phone: (509) 323-3484 Home phone: 456-2571 |
Room RC 218 6/25, 7/2, 7/6, 7/9, 7/16, 7/23 7/30 6:00-10:00 |
| Office hours: Call for appointment | email: beebe@gonzaga.edu |
| Course
Description Course Objectives Learning Activities Web Based Syllabus Assessment and Grading Required Texts |
BLACKBOARD LINK
Blackboard Information and Login Instructions |
Sessions and Assignments Advanced Session 1: June 25 Session 2: July 2 Session 3: July 6 |
Session 4: July 9 Session 5: July 16 Session 6: July 23 Session 7: July 30 |
Reading assignment
Becker (1986, pp. 164 -167, 1-108 and then reread pages 164-167) Writing for
Social Scientists
Wolcott (1990, pp. 9-90) Writing Up Qualitative Research.
Creswell (1998, pp. 167-191) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design.
Creswell, John (1998, pp. 193-218) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design.
Creswell (1998) Ethnography and Case Study(See pages identified in the
Analytic Table of Contents by Tradition)
Ely (1991, pp. 179-218) Reflecting. Doing Qualitative Research.
Miles and Huberman (1994),( pp245-top 277) Qualitative Data Analysis:
An Expanded Source book.
OptionalLab Notes by Tim Rogers and Tanya Kalmanovitch Department of
Psychology at the University of Calgary Psychology 413: Nonexperimental Research
Methods in Psychology
Writing Up
http://www.psych.ucalgary.ca/CourseNotes/old/PSYC413/Assignments/LabManual/proj4/writeup.html
Written assignment
(a) Identify at least one important point from the assigned Miles and Huberman
reading You may either quote or do a summary of the points and should
identify the pages where the material is found. Follow this with one to three
sentences of a subjective response. Post to the Discussion Board by 9:00pm July
8.
(b) Return to the log of the RAP and identify at least three ideas from
the Miles and Huberman referenced in Beebe 2001 (you might want to look at Miles
and Huberman) assignment that you could use in "making sense" out of it and
indicated how you would use each. Bring your notes to class.
(c)Identify at least one important point from Becker, Wolcott, Creswell and
Ely, that you would not want your classmates to miss. You may either quote or
do a summary of the points and should identify the pages where the material
is found. Follow this with one or two sentences that compare the differences
in approaches suggested by each of these autors and one to three sentences of
a subjective response. Post to the Discussion Board by 9:00pm July 8.
(d)Bring to class two or three sentences that describe Ethnography and Case
Study how they differs from each other. Does not have to be posted to the
Discussion Board.
(e) Locate and make a copy of a qualitative research study that is of particular
interest to you. This should be an article (or even a dissertation) that used
a qualitative approach and NOT an article about qualitative methodology.
Examples and Possible sources of on-line articles using qualitative research. You may be more successful finding a article that interests you in one of the journals that publish qualitative research Periodicals Friendly to Qualitative Research.
On-line full articles (but not all are qualitative)Class activities
Education Policy Analysis Archives
Electronic Journal of Sociology
Sociological Research Online
Studies using NUD*IST [http://www.qsr.com.au/resources/articles&reviews.asp#reports]06/27/01
Tables-of Content and Other information on journals that publish qualitative research International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 06/27/01 [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/frameloader.html?http://www.journals.tandf.co.uk/journals/tf/09518398.html]
The Qualitative Review
Qualitative Health Research
Anthropology and Education Quarterly [http://www.aaanet.org/cae/aeq/index.htm]06/27/01
Resources for Social Researchers maintained by Kevan Edwards, University of Minnesota.
Anthropology Web Links maintained by Jim Moore6/24/00
Example: Teacher Socialization in Technological Education from the Journal of Technology Education
Discussion of Ethnography and Case Study led by volunteers. Special attention to conditions where each would be appropriate..
Small group work on codes of the interview
Start with discussion of what needs to be changed in the log.
Work on codes for the transcript.
Discussion on the use of Miles and Huberman. Implications for the RAP
interview analysis
Start the analysis process based on Miles and Huberman.
Presentation by groups on their progress.
Let the instructor approve the research study that you have copied.
|
contact docinfo@gonzaga.edu or write to Doctoral Program in Leadership Studies Gonzaga University Spokane, WA USA 99258 (509) 323-3490 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Page maintained by beebe@gonzaga.edu revised 03/15/2001 |