Feminist Theory
b.
1632 in Wrigton, Somerset, England
d.
1704
Son
of attorney/law clerk
Puritan
family
Studied
the classics at Westminster School
Attended
Christ Church, Oxford
Dissatisified
with Scholasticism
Interested
empiricism
Worked
with chemist; served in diplomatic corps in Brandenburg; studied Descartes;
rethought his earlier intolerance of Catholics
Inheritance
studied medicine; noted physician; successful
operation on Lord Ashley Lord of Shaftesbury led to his lifelong patronage
Exile
Unfortunately, Shaftesbury opposed the Stuarts, was
tried for treason (acquitted), but fled to Holland
Locke followed
him
Wrote A Letter on Toleration
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
Drafted Two Treatises on Government (response to Robert Filmore aka
Filmer) partially in support of opposing Charles I; postponed publication till
1689 (after the Glorious Revolution)
Major
influence on the American founders
Esp.
Jefferson, Paine and Publius (The Federalist Papers authors)
Declaration of Independence
ÒWe hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That
to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their
just powers from the consent of the governed.Ó
Right or even
duty to revolt:
Ò That
whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the
right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government,
laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such
form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be
changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath
shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable,
than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same
object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their
right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new
guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of
these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter
their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great
Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct
object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove
this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.Ó