The New Europe

An Abbreviated History of Europe

Based on Ginsberg, Chapter 1, Unity and Disunity

 

European Unity

     Not a new idea

     Why should we expect todayÕs attempt to me more successful, lasting than previous attempts?

 

Even so, disunity is still a possibility, esp. as conditions change, new threats arise

 

Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces

Centripetal – those that unite

Centrifugal – those that push apart

 

Centripetal/uniting factors/common denominators: geography, history, religion, economy, civilization

 

Centrifugal/disuniting factors: religious difference, economic competition, nationalism, nationalistic power-seeking, different perceptions of external threats

 

Earlier Incarnations of Unity

The Roman Empire

      The Carolingian Empire/Holy Roman Empire

      The Crusades

      The Hanseatic League

      The Renaissance

      Consolidation of the HRE by the Hapsburgs

      The Enlightenment

      The Concert of Europe

      The League of Nations

      The United Nations

 

Disunity/Competition

     1054 The Schism

      1066 Norman Conquest

      1337-1453 Hundred Years War

      14th Century The plague

      15th-20th Centuries Exploration/ Colonialism/Imperialism

      16th Century The Reformation

      1618-1648 Thirty Years War

      1648 The Peace of Westphalia

      1799-1814 Napoleonic Wars

      1854-1856 Crimean War

      1914-1919 WWI

1919 Treaty of Versailles

1939-1945 WWII

 

 

 

 

 

*Key Difference:

     Voluntary Unity or Unity by Force

 

 

 

 

What are some of the events/tendencies Ginsberg has bolded throughout the chapter and what is their significance?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facts/Ideas/Events with Repeated Significance

     1.  The significance of the Mediterranean Basin (15).

 

     2.  The inability of the Roman Empire to fend off foreign attacks and to assimilate large populations of ÒoutsidersÓ (17).

 

     3.  Map 1.2  EuropeÕs Ònatural constituency;Ó the Original Six;

what they share:  geography, history, religion, economy, civilization (resources?) (18).

    

 

 

4.        Battles betweens the Christians and Muslims (19-20).

 

Ginsberg stresses how the Crusades affected the Islamic worldÕs perception of Europe/Christianity.

 

Also important, how the experience of invasion/rule by the Ottomans has shaped EuropeÕs view of the East/Islam.

 

5. The end of the Napoleonic Wars, developed an international system based on unifying principles (25).

 

6.  Avoiding a punitive peace/creating a just and lasting peace (24-25).

 

7.  The Concert of Europe as the model for the European Council, i.e., summits of European heads of government and state (27).

 

8.  The Concert of Europe as enshrining the concept of interstate cooperation at the highest levels to maintain peace and address common security and other interests (27).

 

     9.  The Blue Print (for International Organizations, defined as: 

an organization of three or more states who together address a common need or function, with a permanent base, with international civil servants who do not report to the member governments, and which holds periodic or regular meetings.

 

The worldÕs first IO:  The Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine, established in 1815 at the Congress of Vienna

 

**Note, once again, the RhineÕs location

 

     10.  Political ideology as a uniting force (28).

     In the EUÕs case, social market capitalism

      aka Social Democracy**

 

      11.  Economic/Functional Integration

     roots in GermanyÕs Zollverein (1834) (30)

 

     12.  A Disuniting Trend:  extreme nationalism (29)

      causes interstate conflict

      chauvinism

      irredentism

      colonialism

 

 

 

What do you think?

Based on history, should we be optimistic or pessimistic about the EuropeÕs prospects for unity?

 

 

Ginsberg is optimistic

Stress voluntary nature of todayÕs integration (instead of force/military defeat/empire building of the past)