Democratization of Eastern Europe

Critical Intellectuals:
    THOSE WHO NOT ONLY HAVE THE ABILITY TO MANIUPLATE SYMBOLS WITH EXPERTISE, BUT WHO HAVE ALSO GAINED A REPUTATION OF OR COMMITMENT TO GENERAL VALUES AND WHO HAVE A BROAD EVALUATIVE OUTLOOK DERIVED FROM SUCH COMMITMENT (LIPSET AND DOBSON, 1972).
 
Intellectuals in European society
    Traditionally, play a more overt
    Self-conscious role in society
 
    Can be conceived of as a class
     “the intelligentsia”
 
Their role:
    Issuing critiques of society, politics
    Gramscii “elaborating ideology”
 
In American society today
    The tyranny of experts, scientists, specialists
    Foucault (in Kennedy, 286)
        As members intelligentsia become more and more specialized, speak to             smaller and smaller audience.  Lose their capacity to speak to whole of                 society.  Lose this "expertise"?
 
In Eastern Europe
    The intelligentsia as creators and preservers of the Nation
    As the moral conscience of the Nation
 
    Social responsibility to speak for Nation (as against the state -        
    whatever its form?)

 
In Marxist-Leninist Societies
    The intelligentsia as the most dangerous class
 
     To be coopted or neutralized, liquidated
 
Impact of Stalinism and Brezhnev era on Intellectuals
 
Moral dilemma – what to do, when there is nothing to be done? (Jacek Kuron’s, founder of KOR question)


 
Kennedy’s Theses on Critical Intellectuals: 
 
Critical intellectuals are vital to healthy, vibrant civil society, hence, for democracy.
 
Critical intellectuals were important part of bringing down state-socialists regimes.
 
New groups of critical intellectuals must develop in post-Communist societies to ensure their lasting democratization.
 
    


Civil Society and the State
Lockean version:  society prior to the state; market mechanisms preferred.
 
In classical liberal democracy, interests of civil society oppose politics “practices in the name of some general will or public opinion” (Kennedy, 282).
 
In Montesquieu’s version, civil society as “something constructed through open discussion” (Kennedy, 283)
 
Freedom = vigor of public debate and its influence over the state (Kennedy, 283)
 
Stalinist party, i.e., the State, claims to act in the historical interests of a universal class


Critical Intellectuals of the 1980s
Physicians, peace activists in Kennedy’s work on Poland          
    
Natural scientists, environmentalists important in Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia, Russia
 
The traditional intelligentsia also played roles
     e.g. in Poland, Catholic intelligentsia
     Kardinal Wojtyla, later Pope John Paul II
     Literary figures such as Solzehnitzyn, Havel