Feminist Thought
GenocideÕs Sexuality
Based on MacKinnon, Chpt. 22,
in Are Women Human?
Examples of Sexual Atrocities
in Genocide
Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina
Rwanda
What is sex DOING in the
genocide?
i.e., what is its genocidal purpose, function?
How does it work to destroy a
people?
Under law, genocidal acts
must:
Òbe undertaken with the
intent to destroy a racial, ethnic, religious or national group Ôas suchÕ
(210).Ó
Further, individual
perpetrators NEED NOT know why sexual means are being employed
Important why?
Generally, INTENT is a crucial
component of committing a crime
Bosnian atrocities
CONTEXT is important
Òexposed
after a historical period in which rape had been publicly reframed as a
political outrage to women, supporting disclosure. One could say the world came to comprehend that the Serbian
campaign was genocidal (as opposed to civil war) through understanding that the
rapes in it were real and were being systematically directed against
non-Serbian women. Most
distinctively, sexuality, including forced sex and forced pregnancy, became
conscious, organized weapons of a genocidal policyÓ (211-212).
Contrast with Nazism
Officiall, regime Òanti-sexÓ
Puritanical
But obsession with racial
purity
ÒAryanÓ stock
Lebensborn
Actually rape WAS an integral
part of HitlerÕs Europe/occupation
Jewish women kept/used as
sexual slaves
Polish/Russian/French/Norwegian
women captured/impregnated
Children allowed to live if
deemed racially pure
Why donÕt we know this?
Difference between genocidal
rape and other rapes that occur in war, e.g. the rape of Nanking, or rapes of
German women by invading Russian soldiers at end of WWII
Not the intent to destroy
See p. 221
Òevery woman pregnant with
the child of an attacking group is prevented from conceiving a child of other
biological heritageÓ
basis of the Akeysu decision
on Rwanda
Women as a group
MacKinnon argues that sexual
abuse/violence
Both constitutes and destroys women
AS A GROUP (224-229)
Rape, sexual harassment, pornography, prostitution: hate crimes
They happen to women
**because they are women
Yet not legally acknowledged Òas suchÓ
Note differences in language/tone of
CERD vs. CEDAW (in Intro, 10-11)
Despite these differences,
MacKinnon is optimistic about
international law, globalization
creating new possibilities for gender
justice
New stance on gender equality:
substantive equality; recognition of
womenÕs position
as a group
Sexism/misogyny as global (232)