How does the Brookings Review come to the conclusion that Americans disapprove of affirmative action “in theory” or “in the abstract” but “like it in practice?”
 
 
 

Is such a gap between people’s opinions in the abstract and in practice apparent in other public policy areas?
 
 

Why does such a gap exist?
 
 

In Wolfe’s piece about revising affirmative action, he considers arguments about “merit.”  Most opponents of affirmative action argue that such policies violate the idea that ones’ opportunities and accomplishments should reflect one’s merits.
 

How would a proponent of affirmative action answer this argument?
 

Wolfe essentially agrees with former President Clinton’s “Mend it, don’t end it” stance toward affirmative action.

What would mending affirmative action in college admission or in hiring decisions look like in practice?

Should there be different standards and practices for “public” and “private” institutions and employers here?
 
 

Is it possible to assess someone’s qualifications for school or work without considering their race, class, or gender?