Sources of Immigrants in the EU by Region
Other EU country 36%
CE Europe 6%
Rest of Europe 22%
Africa 19%
Asia 11%
Schengen Agreement 1985
incorporated into the treaties
by the Treaty of Amsterdam
13 countries participating
(not UK or Ireland)
Coordinate Border Controls, Visa, Asylum and Residency Requirements
Issues to be decided by unanimity til 2003
Weak Links in the "Ring Fence"
Biggest enforcement problems
southern coast of Spain and Ceuta
Italy-Albania-Yugoslavia
Push/Pull Factors in European
Migration/Immigration
Pushes:
structural changes - declining regions,
disintegration of CE economies, Yugoslavian, Albanian crises, Famines/wars
in developing regions
Pulls:
Post-war labor shortages, Wealth/growth
in core areas, Organized guest worker programs, Post-colonial relationships
Reinventing European Citizenship
a new more universal concept of citizenship
is unfolding
related to globalization
Soysal: trans-national membership
based on concept of universal personhood
[human rights]
rather than national belonging
Soysal uses treatment of guestworkers to
illustrate this shift
Post-War Trends:
labor shortages in W. Europe
economic boom
Guestworker programs
human rights movement
Post Cold War Trends:
globalization
need for labor mobility
permanence of Guestworkers
e.g. UK, Fr, Ger, Swed, Neth, Belg, Austr,
Den, Switz
Average guestworker stay = 15 years
In most cases, guestworkers have failed
to integrate into host societies
e.g. ghettos in France (banlieus), Sweden
(Rinkeby), Netherlands (SE Amsterdam)
why failed integration?
most attribute to cultural gaps between
migrants and hosts
Soysal - different approach
incorporation as a macro-level process
shaped by national institutions and global discourse of human rights
15 million migrants in Europe
5 million from EU countries
Foreigners as % of 1990 population
Switz 16% (now at 18%!!)
Belg, Ger, Fr, Swed 6-10%
Aust, Neth, UK, Den 3-5%
Rates of Naturalization
highest in Neth, Fr, Switz, Swed, Ger
Citizenship
What is Citizenship?
Outgrowth of state-building of 18th and
19th centuries
New concept trans-national membership necessary
- why?
Now included in welfare schemes, educational
systems, trade unions;
and enjoy many of the rights and privileges
of citizenship.
Why?
Major sources of immigration
UK-India, Pakistan, Bangladesh
France - Algeria, Morocco, Portugal, West
Africa
Germany - Turkey (Kurds), Yugoslavia,
Greece, Italy
Italy - West and North Africa, Albania
Sweden - Turkey (Kurds), Poland, Bangladesh,
Somalia, Iran, Chile
Netherlands - Turkey, Surinam, Indonesia,
South Molucca
Soysal's Models of Incorporation
Horizontal axis: centralized or decentralized
process
Vertical axis: locus of action state or
society
Centralized | Decentralized | |
Society | Corporatist (Sweden, Netherlands) | Liberal (Switzerland, UK) |
State | Statist (France) | Fragmented (Gulf States) |
Corporatist Regimes:
stress collective group identity
groups as "natural"
migrant organizations as natural channels
of incorporation
to facilitate participation in society
state as a centralizing force
emphasizes the public interest
and welfare of the group
Sweden-any ethnic group with 1000 members
is entitled to organization and consultation w/government
Netherlands-designates groups: Moluccans,
Surinamese, Antilleans, migrant workers and families, Gypsies, refugees
(not Chinese, Pakistanis)
Rights/Benefits
Sweden: right to express and develop cultural
heritage
mother-tongue instruction for children
SBC req'd to produce programming
newspapers, periodicals subsidized
right to participation/consultation
state funded organizations
can vote in local and reg'l elections
after 3-year residency
Netherlands: emancipation as goal
right to own schools, radio, tv w/public
funding
right to consultation
state funded organizations
can vote in local elections after 5-year
residency
Statist Regimes:
centralized approach
uniformly equal individuals vis-a-vis
the state - with state as active agent in market and educational processes
no intermediary structures between citizen
and state
France:
since 1958 Social Fund for Immigrant Workers
and their Families (not by group)
since 1976 some education in mother-tongue
after EC directive
growing number of associations
some support for ethnic festivals
state attempting to balance republican
citizenship and multi-culturalism
Liberal Regimes:
Migrants as individuals
Incorporated thru labor market
Integrated at community level
UK: "racial equality" "equality of opportunity"
"good race relations" as goals to be accomplished
at individual level
e.g. legal statutes against discrimination
youth training, language training, community
centers, Urban Aid
Switzerland: "integration" goal
sets yearly quotas (by canton) upon consultation
with bus. and trade assc.
no state support for organizations
funding for vocat/lang educ?work!
vote locally in Neuchatel and Jura
Germany: A Mixed Case of Corporatism,
Statism, Liberalism
No recognition of specific groups in policies,
goals
But social service provision centralized through trade unions and agencies and migrants assigned to them according to their religious/national orientation
Vocational training/participation as gateway to society
Some mother-tongue instruction and some support for migrant assc.
No voting